蜜桃传媒

In 2006, the Sloan Center on Aging & Work published a brief titled 鈥溾�� by Marcie Pitt-Catsouphes, center director, and Michael A. Smyer, former co-director. The brief offers a perspective that employers today would be wise to keep in mind.

In it, the researchers discussed the difficulty of pinning down what employers mean when they refer to 鈥渙lder workers,鈥� 鈥渕ature workers,鈥� 鈥渟enior workers,鈥� and 鈥渆xperienced workers.鈥� Here鈥檚 the problem. In times past, Dr. Pitt-Catsouphes and Dr. Smyer pointed out, a 鈥渕id-career worker seemed to become an older worker once they started to plan for retirement.鈥� What鈥檚 more, the 鈥渟tatus of being an older worker signaled the end of a career.鈥� Data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics showing many adults choosing to work past the age at which they could claim retirement benefits indicated to Dr. Pitt-Catsouphes and Dr. Smyer that a more dynamic view of age than proximity to eligibility for benefits was in order. They argued:

The results of a 2009 survey conducted by听听offer further evidence that old ideas about 鈥渨ho is old鈥� have lost their usefulness. One in five employers (21 percent) reported that as their employees approach retirement age, they ask to continue working. Most employers in that situation (86 percent) said they were happy to oblige, and for the following reasons:

• Employers want to hold on to [older workers鈥橾 intellectual capital (65 percent)
• Mature workers can help train and mentor others (61 percent)
• Mature workers know how to weather a tough economy (42 percent)
• Employers have more time to transition responsibilities (36 percent)

In a recent听, Jacquelyn B. James, Ph.D., the Sloan Center鈥檚 research director, stated:

The new reality she describes is a challenge for managers and human resources administrators at a time when many workers nearing and passing retirement age are not, in fact, retiring, but instead are continuing to work and add value to their companies.

With this demographic and cultural shift, the words employers and employees use to describe age and the old ideas that underlie the words must change. The 2006 Sloan Center brief quoted Victor Marshall, a scholar at the Institute on Aging at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, as follows:

So,听who are you calling old?听A more perceptive and precise vocabulary is the gateway to new responses that can energize talent management and retention initiatives now and in the future.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS:

Kim Lee DeAngelis, Ph.D., is a research associate at the Sloan Center on Aging & Work at Boston College. She focuses on current case studies and workshops related to the center鈥檚 research. Previously, she was director of human resources at Talbots, Inc. She earned her doctorate in human and organizational systems at Fielding Graduate University, where she conducted research on Generation X in the workplace.

Samantha Greenfield听is an employer engagement specialist at the Sloan Center on Aging & Work, connecting employers around the world with the center鈥檚 research projects. She has worked in the human resources department of two large Boston law firms. She has a bachelor鈥檚 degree in communications from Elon University, in North Carolina.